Unmanaged - a D framework on github
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Wed Mar 20 05:42:09 PDT 2013
On 2013-03-20 08:57, Benjamin Thaut wrote:
> You still can't replace evertything with custom alloc templates and have
> nice syntax. There are at least two cases where it does not work nicely:
>
> 1) Arrays (no new T [size] syntax)
> 2) Inner classes (a template can't automatically capture the outer class)
>
> So I think overloading new and delete actually has its place. But the
> way it is currently implemented in D is useless in my eyes.
Instead of having a special keyword like we have now. We could have, as
has been suggested before, a regular function or method.
With a class, there's also the possibility to return a different type or
a singleton:
class Foo
{
Foo new ()
{
return Bar.new();
}
}
class Bar : Foo {}
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list