Arch Linux users and packagers : upcoming coomunity/dmd package change

[Dicebot]

On Saturday, 18 May 2013 at 19:19:10 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> Agreed.  I had this discussion recently too along the topic of:
>  Should we
> allow people to install libphobos/libdruntime in a common 
> library
> directory, or keep it private as an integral part of the 
> compiler?   IMO,
> giving given it's close ties between the two, it should always 
> be integral,
> and the idea of linking against libphobos from an application 
> written in
> something other than D is still not in any way feasible task.

I thought about asking your advice on this topic but it was not 
urgent enough :) What currently prevents having different 
runtimes but single phobos library for different compilers? How 
hard is such setup to achieve?