code.dlang.org now supports categories and search - license information now required

ilya-stromberg ilya-stromberg-2009 at yandex.ru
Thu Oct 17 06:45:33 PDT 2013


On Thursday, 17 October 2013 at 13:31:06 UTC, Jacob Carlborg 
wrote:
> On 2013-10-17 11:33, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
>> There has been another important change that requires existing 
>> packages
>> to be updated: All packages must now have the fields 
>> "description" and
>> "license" present to be published. The license field has to be 
>> set
>> according to the specification [1]. All existing branches and 
>> version
>> tags stay unaffected by this requirement and are still 
>> available.
>
> Perhaps add the license: Apple Public Source License. This can 
> be useful for creating bindings to Apple specific libraries. Is 
> there a corresponding license for Microsoft?

Yes:
Microsoft Public License (Ms-PL)
Microsoft Reciprocal License (Ms-RL)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shared_source


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list