dunit 0.7.0 released
Meta
jared771 at gmail.com
Tue Oct 22 01:05:45 PDT 2013
On Monday, 21 October 2013 at 11:58:14 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
wrote:
> I confess that I don't understand why anyone is creating any
> unit test
> projects for D, and I'd likely vote against any attempt to add
> such a thing to
> Phobos. D has built in unit testing functionality, and it works
> great. Maybe
> some additional assert-like functions could be useful (similar
> to assertThrown
> or assertNotThrown), but we really don't need much beyond what
> the language
> provides.
>
> - Jonathan m Davis
I have to almost completely disagree with you here. I often find
myself rolling my own small testing extensions for the built in
unittests, and a standard solution is sorely needed. The only
thing I agree with you on is that any such solution would
probably be better off not overriding assertion behaviour, but as
Dicebot said, that's no longer necessary.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list