DUnit: Advanced unit testing toolkit.

Dicebot public at dicebot.lv
Wed Sep 25 12:55:09 PDT 2013

On Wednesday, 25 September 2013 at 19:50:47 UTC, jostly wrote:
> Maybe... in my mind it depends on whether there are more than 
> one test per unit test block, because I really like each 
> failing test to be enumerated as well. But I can see the 
> benefit - that would allow me to have tests directly in the 
> unit test block, instead of wrapped inside delegates like it's 
> done in specd. Ideally, a generic runner would support both 
> immediate and deferred tests.

UDAs + recent trait to get all unit-tests during compile-time 
really favors instead having lot of small independent annotated 
unit-test blocks.

More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list