Review Candidates awaited!

[Suliman]

On Saturday, 1 February 2014 at 19:52:59 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Looking at http://wiki.dlang.org/Review_Queue there are 4 
> proposals that are marked as "Ready for review" or "Ready for 
> comments". I can proceed with any of those any time proposal 
> author sends me an e-mail acknowledging his attention.
>
> Walter Bright, Idan Arye, Paul D. Anderson, Michael Rynn - I am 
> speaking about you ;)
>
> Also if there is something ready but not in queue - don't 
> hesitate about it.

Is this a good practice to give name: std.xml2 with digit at the 
end? Maybe it would be better to name it's simply std.xml ? And 
for prevent conflict rename old realization as std.xml.old ?

Also what what is the final decision about using std.unicode 
instead of std.uni? The first one is much more logical, than 
short variant.