dmd 2.065 beta 3

[Martin Nowak]

On 02/10/2014 10:24 PM, extrawurst wrote:
> I gave beta 3 on my win32 dev machine a try today and noticed that
> building vibe.d (a dependancy in almost all my projects) takes
> noticeably longer to built. observing the process shows that beta3
> consumes almost 1.5GB of RAM while dmd 2.064 'just' uses 1GB.

Is this optimized?

I had the impression that compiling diet templates in optimized builds 
now takes much longer, but I might be wrong.