std.signal : voting has begun
Adam Wilson
flyboynw at gmail.com
Mon Jan 20 15:51:08 PST 2014
On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:16:42 -0800, Robert <jfanatiker at gmx.at> wrote:
> Thank you Dicebot for stepping up. Unfortunately the demand seems to be
> very, very low, so I believe we are going to stick with the old
> std.signals.
>
> Thanks again!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Robert
>
Which is a shame too. We could have definitely used this in Aurora... But
I think Andrei's comments kind of nixed the discussion. :-S
> On Monday, 20 January 2014 at 13:51:44 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> On Monday, 6 January 2014 at 09:11:09 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>>> Some time ago there have been a review for `std.signal` Phobos
>>> proposal
>>> (http://forum.dlang.org/thread/ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz@forum.dlang.org#post-ujlhznaphepibgtpcoqz:40forum.dlang.org).
>>> It have not received much feedback and I was a it too busy to proceed
>>> with final voting at that moment but with no outstanding issues to
>>> address nothing prevents that final step.
>>>
>>> Let's put 2 week deadline to refresh memories about the proposal and
>>> make some decision. Voting closes at January 20th 23:59 GMT 0
>>>
>>> Please take some time and help make Phobos better ;)
>>
>> Less than 10 hours are left.
>
--
Adam Wilson
GitHub/IRC: LightBender
Aurora Project Coordinator
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list