dmd 2.065 beta 1

[Andrew Edwards]

On 1/21/14, 2:20 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> Can we *please* have a well-established, useful, naming scheme for tags and
> packages? 2.064beta3, 2.064beta4, 2.064.2, 2.065-b1... Are you as frustrated as
> me?

I was just in the process of addressing this. Based on recent issues 
with using the packaging scripts, I've changed the naming convention as 
follows:

	#.###.b#    // beta
	#.###.rc#   // release candidate
	#.#.0       // release
         #.#.#       // hotfix (where last # != 0)

That should solve any issues you may have.