dmd 2.065 beta 1

[deadalnix]

On Tuesday, 21 January 2014 at 20:48:27 UTC, Andrew Edwards wrote:
> On 1/21/14, 2:20 PM, Dejan Lekic wrote:
>> Can we *please* have a well-established, useful, naming scheme 
>> for tags and
>> packages? 2.064beta3, 2.064beta4, 2.064.2, 2.065-b1... Are you 
>> as frustrated as
>> me?
>
> I was just in the process of addressing this. Based on recent 
> issues with using the packaging scripts, I've changed the 
> naming convention as follows:
>
> 	#.###.b#    // beta
> 	#.###.rc#   // release candidate
> 	#.#.0       // release
>         #.#.#       // hotfix (where last # != 0)
>
> That should solve any issues you may have.

Thank !