std.signal : voting results

[ilya-stromberg]

On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 14:18:15 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
> The new std.signal is IMHO far better than the old one. Why not
> simply replace it, and then look forward to future improvements?

Guys, were are you was a few days ago when voting still was open?!

Dicebot, can we continue voting at least 1-2 weeks? It looks like 
we finally have interest to the `std.signal` module.