std.signal : voting results

[Dicebot]

On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 14:38:48 UTC, ilya-stromberg 
wrote:
> On Wednesday, 22 January 2014 at 14:18:15 UTC, Dejan Lekic 
> wrote:
>> The new std.signal is IMHO far better than the old one. Why not
>> simply replace it, and then look forward to future 
>> improvements?
>
> Guys, were are you was a few days ago when voting still was 
> open?!
>
> Dicebot, can we continue voting at least 1-2 weeks? It looks 
> like we finally have interest to the `std.signal` module.

No. I am not adjusting procedure post-factum and when evaluating 
actual results single "No" vote from Phobos core team (Andrei) 
outweights few extra "Yes" votes anyway.

We can schedule another review / voting relatively soon though, 
assuming Robert is still willing to push for it.