DMD 2.066 Alpha

[Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 6/12/2014 11:13 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 6/12/14, 7:26 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:

>> It
>> 1. allows escaping final, which we can't do without it or an equivalent
>> 2. does exactly what everybody expects
>> 3. is already implemented
>> 4. looks much nicer than your proposal
>>
>> Why not just leave it in?  I'm already using it, and it makes
>> extern(C++) classes MUCH more readable (ie DDMD)
>
> Please no new keyword for what can be done already. It's not
> proportional response.
>

AFAIK, escaping final *can't* be done.