D/Objective-C 64bit

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 2014-11-01 01:54, Michel Fortin wrote:

> I can't remember if this is an oversight or just something that I hadn't
> got to yet. In my mind this was already done.

I did a grep for "dealloc" and couldn't find anything related.

> Anyway, the answer is *yes*: the destructor should be mapped to the
> "dealloc" selector. It should also implicitly call the destructor for
> any struct within the object and call it's superclass's destructor (if
> present), the usual D semantics for a destructor (that part might
> already work actually).

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg