D is for Data Science

[Tomer Rosenschtein via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:57:31 UTC, CraigDillabaugh 
wrote:
> On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:41:12 UTC, Tomer Rosenschtein 
> wrote:
>> On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:31:19 UTC, CraigDillabaugh 
>> wrote:
>>> On Friday, 28 November 2014 at 22:00:21 UTC, bearophile wrote:
>>>> Tomer Rosenschtein:
>>>>
>>>>> Awesome article.
>>>>> "Paper of the week" is a modest word for this.
>>>>
>>>> The D code is not good.
>>>>
>>>> Bye,
>>>> bearophile
>>>
>>> Maybe not good by the standards of this group, but it does 
>>> represent the efforts of someone doing 'real work', so I 
>>> think it is worthwhile.
>>>
>>> I would bet that 'in the wild' there is a lot more D code 
>>> that looks like that than what might be considered good, 
>>> idiomatic D.
>>>
>>> Craig
>>
>> I understand why D is still underground.The guy use R, by 
>> miracle he suddently test a strong typed-compiled-lang and he 
>> concludes: "well, those compiled lang seem interesting...".
>> Then Someone post this here, on reddit, on HackerNews...
>>
>> And Miracle!
>>
>> Everybody thinks it's awesome.
>> Common...
>
> You're the one that called it awesome!  I don't think anyone 
> here was overly excited about it, but we are always happy to 
> see D get good press.
>
> Maybe the guy the wrote the article is just an average 
> programmer, but hey most of the programmers in the world are 
> average programmers - so this article could appeal to that 
> segment of the market.

It's not my call. it's one the right side, twitter things.
And about "awesome", it looks like you dont get my irony.