associative arrays with manual memory management

via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Tue Aug 25 23:50:25 PDT 2015


On Monday, 24 August 2015 at 12:01:52 UTC, Ilya Yaroshenko wrote:
> http://code.dlang.org/packages/aammm/~master

It would be nice to have a test example for other allocators. I'm 
especially interested in how much speed we can gain with using a 
non-shared BlockAllocator in combination with aammm.AA.

Can the whole AA be made `@safe pure nothrow` if the allocator is 
stored inside the AA itself (non-shared)?

I'm especially interested in using this for keys and values only 
with no indirections.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list