Better docs for D (WIP)

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 12/29/2015 10:20 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Tuesday, 29 December 2015 at 14:26:48 UTC, Rikki Cattermole wrote:
>> Okay, I remember you saying something a bit different on IRC (at least
>> to my understanding).
>
> Well, I'm still a bit iffy on it, to attach a name I used the first
> member of the enum which might not pass review muster in dmd itself, but
> you could also probably just generate a random name for it.
>
> Actually, I think dmd *does* generate random names for anonymous enums
> internally anyway. I know it does for structs and functions etc.
>
> dmd could probably get away without a name too, since it doesn't care
> about SEO and linking, whereas I do.

Then why document it? If it's for SEO, what SEO scenarios woukd be 
covered by this feature that can't be done with simple workarounds? -- 
Andrei