Packt is looking for someone to author a "Learning D"
Craig Dillabaugh via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Sat Feb 14 20:38:07 PST 2015
On Saturday, 14 February 2015 at 18:15:09 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
> On Saturday, 14 February 2015 at 17:04:24 UTC, Russel Winder
> wrote:
>> Obviously XeLaTeX is the
>> correct medium, but AsciiDoc is acceptable as a second best.
>
> During the editing of the Russian translation of TDPL, I've
> worked in MS Word as well. Probably its main advantage is its
> collaboration tools: you can see who added or deleted which
> parts, and toggle between visible edits and final text easily.
> You can also add comments to a text range; by passing the
> document along, this made possible even short conversations.
>
> What would be the equivalent of such collaboration in a
> non-MS-Word-based workflow?
Well, if you do the document with Latex on git (or some similar
version control), you get most of the same stuff. Latex has a
comment tool where you can do margin comments if you wish, and of
course you can also do comments in the 'code' if you want - they
don't show up in the document at all. Heck, I am sure there is
a package for everything in Latex if you look hard enough.
A MS-word document with 'track changes' on, edited by multiple
people, is the greatest eyesore known to humanity. I still don't
understand why anyone who had a choice between Latex and MS-Word
would pick MS-Word for anything longer than 25 pages...
Just my personal opinion as one who recently finished a 200 page
thesis in Latex, and is now working for a company where we do all
our internal documents in Word. Latex certainly has its ugly
warts,
but it is so nice for lengthy document1.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list