Gary Willoughby: "Why Go's design is a disservice to intelligent programmers"

[bachmeier via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Wednesday, 25 March 2015 at 22:30:15 UTC, Ola Fosheim Grøstad 
wrote:
> Go has stability, is production ready and has an ecosystem with 
> commercial value.

You could say the same things about Cobol or PHP, but that 
doesn't mean the languages themselves should be free from 
criticism. My opinion of Go was very much consistent with the 
article. It doesn't mean much to me to have a stable language 
that I don't want to use. His points are valid.