Gary Willoughby: "Why Go's design is a disservice to intelligent programmers"
lobo via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Wed Mar 25 20:11:26 PDT 2015
On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 02:34:04 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 02:04:26 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
[snip]
It would have been better if several languages were used in
comparison to Go.
Overall the blog post is a bit immature with little rigor and too
much emotion. The code comparisons that aren't idiomatic for
either language nor behaviorally equivalent.
It reads like a D-zealot had decided to write this blog before
they even clicked the download link for the Go compiler. And so,
their experience was never going to be anything but negative.
That said, Go is unpleasant and probably the most boring language
I've had to write code in.
bye,
lobo
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list