Gary Willoughby: "Why Go's design is a disservice to intelligent programmers"

lobo via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Wed Mar 25 20:11:26 PDT 2015


On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 02:34:04 UTC, Jakob Ovrum wrote:
> On Thursday, 26 March 2015 at 02:04:26 UTC, Laeeth Isharc wrote:
[snip]

It would have been better if several languages were used in 
comparison to Go.

Overall the blog post is a bit immature with little rigor and too 
much emotion. The code comparisons that aren't idiomatic for 
either language nor behaviorally equivalent.

It reads like a D-zealot had decided to write this blog before 
they even clicked the download link for the Go compiler. And so, 
their experience was never going to be anything but negative.

That said, Go is unpleasant and probably the most boring language 
I've had to write code in.


bye,
lobo


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list