Gary Willoughby: "Why Go's design is a disservice to intelligent programmers"

[via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Friday, 27 March 2015 at 01:47:57 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
> The one difference was Go's support for green threads. There's 
> no technical reason why D can't have green threads, it's just 
> that nobody has written the library code to do it.

Go can move stacks and extend them.
Go is closer to having a low latency GC.

These are not small language issues for D.