Gary Willoughby: "Why Go's design is a disservice to intelligent programmers"

[Nick Sabalausky via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 03/26/2015 09:47 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
>
> It seems to me that every significant but one feature of Go has a pretty
> much direct analog in D

I'm no Go expert, but AIUI, Go seems to be one of those languages that 
considers *lacking* certain features to *be* a feature. Ie the whole 
"minimalism" approach to language design. For people who value that (not 
for me personally though), it's a feature D doesn't offer and 
deliberately doesn't try to.