Gary Willoughby: "Why Go's design is a disservice to intelligent programmers"

[Laeeth Isharc via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sunday, 29 March 2015 at 02:15:38 UTC, cym13 wrote:

> Urr.... As an active Python developer, I find that one pretty 
> harsh. It's not that we need to enforce good style, it's that 
> we take good style as granted and choose to lighten it 
> consequently.
>
> On the contrary I think that D has everything to attract a 
> pythonista. Most new, trendy languages like Go or Rust are to 
> down a level to easily suit a python's formated mind, and I 
> guess that if most python developers come to switch language 
> for performance issues (like myself) D's code safety system is 
> definitely very appealing because python's safety is... well... 
> ^^"
>
> Moreover, it is possible to reach a good expressiveness (maybe 
> not as good as python, but that's the whole goal of python so 
> there's no shame in not matching it).
>
> UFCS FTW!

As an active Python developer, what would you add to or change 
about the following:
http://bitbashing.io/2015/01/26/d-is-like-native-python.html