std.experimental.xml available on DUB

[Jacob Carlborg via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 2016-08-03 22:57, Robert burner Schadek wrote:

> Well, currently you have to make that choice as developer, and there is
> always the BufferedLexer which should be good choice is most cases.
> Polymorphic design was not a goal of the project, so I think it is going
> to be hard to add that without sacrificing to much.

I'm not talking about a polymorphic design. I'm talking about how most 
functions work with ranges. They adapt depending on what type the input 
range is. Example, there's one lexer for forward ranges and one for 
input ranges. Why is that necessary? It's not necessary for functions in 
std.algorithm to use different names for a function for different input 
types.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg