DIP1000: Scoped Pointers

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 8/16/2016 6:01 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 01:01:05AM +0000, Chris Wright via Digitalmars-d-announce wrote:
>> On Tue, 16 Aug 2016 18:55:40 +0000, Dicebot wrote:
>>> You need to add one more level of indirection for things to start
>>> going complicated.
>>
>> Presumably scope is transitive, so things shouldn't get horribly
>> complex.
>
> I thought the DIP states the scope is *not* transitive?

It is not transitive.