On the future of DIP1000

[John Colvin via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 21:46:56 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
> On Sunday, 21 August 2016 at 20:01:27 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> - scope is @safe only
>
> Why? I might have @system code that could still benefit from 
> scope.

I guess it would be too restrictive, but I'm just a bit 
frustrated at having to choose between lots of compiler checking 
and none at all. I wish there was a flag for the compiler that 
would give @safe violations as warnings in @system / @trusted 
code, it would be too noisy for routine use but it would be great 
to occasionally look through.