On the future of DIP1000

[Robert burner Schadek via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 06:44:11 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> It would be nice to have the whole picture now, before 
> implementing DIP1000. Then it's possible to review them 
> together, making sure the end goal is actual possible to 
> achieve. Now we just have to trust Andrei and Walter that all 
> features will come together making the end goal possible. We've 
> already seen in the past that some features don't play well 
> together.
>
> It's also not possible/harder to come up with alternatives, 
> that might work better, if we don't have the whole picture.
>
> I'm also not a big fan that the DIP is approved right from the 
> start. Then it's not a DIP, it's more of a FYI. It makes the 
> whole process kind of pointless since Andrei and Walter can 
> choose to ignore the feedback.

What he said !