On the future of DIP1000

[Kagamin via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Monday, 22 August 2016 at 06:44:11 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> It would be nice to have the whole picture now, before 
> implementing DIP1000.

It can be reviewed after the spec is inferred from 
implementation. But yes, it can be unclear how the implementation 
can affect the review process.
Do you have an alternative design for scope?