Battle-plan for CTFE

[deadalnix via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 08:39:56 UTC, Stefan Koch wrote:
> On Monday, 29 August 2016 at 08:05:10 UTC, Rory McGuire wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Dominikus Dittes Scherkl via
>>>
>>> The work you are doing is just awesome!
>>> Many thanks.
>>>
>>
>> +1 your work is key for our success as a community.
>>
>> R
>
> Thanks guys.
>
> I just came up with a nifty little patch that makes it possible 
> to ensure that a function is _only_ used at ctfe.
> Or the opposite.
>
> static assert(__ctfe, "This function is not supposed to be 
> called outside of ctfe");
> and static assert(!__ctfe, "This function is not supposed to be 
> called during ctfe");
>
> similarly you can use static if (__ctfe).
>
> Is it worth trying to get it into master ?

I would say maybe, but let's keep separate things separate. This 
is a language change. I would not include it in the same series 
of patch that change CTFE behavior.