Ddb needs a maintainer
Eugene Wissner via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Sat Feb 13 11:33:12 PST 2016
On Saturday, 13 February 2016 at 15:20:26 UTC, Suliman wrote:
>
> But we already have ddbc, that work pretty fine. Its better to
> force developing of it
I also looked into ddbc before. And it is a great thing since it
is similar to the well known jdbc. I didn't like that it just
wraps C-functions to access the postgresql. But I don't see the
vibe.d incompatibility as a problem. Would be really greate to
merge ddbc and ddb ;)
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list