D Article: Memory Safety

[Jakob Ovrum via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 13:52:57 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
> Reasonable, but the UFCS call can result from some other 
> function defined in same module (Phobos modules are not small 
> at all). Even small unlikely violation can completely destroy 
> benefits of @safe so in my opinion one can't be overly cautious 
> when documenting stuff that requires verification.

I agree. Do you think it's worth mentioning UFCS functions in the 
article?