Battle-plan for CTFE

[ZombineDev via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Tuesday, 5 July 2016 at 21:11:39 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Monday, 4 July 2016 at 07:29:49 UTC, ZombineDev wrote:
>> Nice work! Any chance that you could also improve AliasSeq 
>> algorithms, like those in std.meta to compile faster and use 
>> less memory during compilation? Or is that too different from 
>> CTFE?
>
> Not that I opposes this, but please keep it focused. Doing a 
> bytecode interpreter is a huge task on its own and this seems 
> largely orthogonal.

I was actually wondering if they're orthogonal or some of the 
CTFE improvements could be reused. I was not saying the he should 
work on both if they're not related.