4x faster strlen with 4 char sentinel
Jay Norwood via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Mon Jun 27 20:11:26 PDT 2016
On Tuesday, 28 June 2016 at 01:53:22 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> If we were in interview, I'd ask you "what does this returns if
> you pass it an empty string ?"
I'd say use this one instead, to avoid negative size_t. It is
also a little faster for the same measurement.
nothrow pure size_t strlen2(const(char)* c) {
if (c is null)
return 0;
const(char)* c_save = c;
while (*c){ c+=4; }
while (*c==0){ c--; }
c++;
return c - c_save;
}
2738
540
2744
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list