Adventures in D Programming

[Peter Häggman via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sunday, 8 May 2016 at 17:19:05 UTC, qznc wrote:
> On Sunday, 8 May 2016 at 06:05:36 UTC, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> http://blog.tenstral.net/2016/05/adventures-in-d-programming.html
>
> Thanks, I missed that post until now.
>
>
> "the documentation not matching the actual code is a bad 
> experience for someone new to the language"
>
> I would interpret that as a sign that we want multiple versions 
> of documentation available on the website. For example, Python 
> does that.

You've quoted the wrong part of the paragraph. The real problem 
he encountered was not the doc, it was the phobos bugs in the 
older version shipped with GDC/LDC:

"For GDC, which I used to compile my code due to LDC having bugs 
at that time, this means that it is shipping with a very outdated 
copy of Phobos"

The the doc thing is "just" a symptom. Older offline doc is 
always available in the release archive, it's easy to understand 
that so it's not the actual problem.