A language comparison (seeking productivity-enhancing, well-designed, and concise languages)

Seb via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Wed May 25 15:37:40 PDT 2016


On Tuesday, 24 May 2016 at 04:57:34 UTC, Bauss wrote:
> On Monday, 23 May 2016 at 05:37:10 UTC, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>> Found on Reddit:
>>
>>
>> https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/4kmfp6/the_best_quality_programming_languages/
>>
>> The list:
>>
>>
>> http://www.slant.co/topics/5984/~productivity-enhancing-well-designed-and-concise-rather-than-popular-or-time-tested-programming-languag
>>
>> Ali
>
> That's a pretty interesting list. It's nice to see D on the top 
> of the list

Yes it is, but let's still have a lot at the two listed cons 
there:

- Error messages can be confusing, esp. to new-comers.

- Reference implementation not open source
Part of the reference compiler DMD was made at Symantec and 
cannot be relicensed.


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list