Formal review of DIP1001

[Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 11/17/2016 06:35 AM, Dicebot wrote:
> Disposition: REJECT. A proposal for a similar or identical feature would
> need to be include qualitatively new motivation/evidence of usefulness.
>
> Please follow the link for the full review text / rationale:
> https://github.com/dlang/DIPs/blob/master/DIPs/DIP1001.md#review

"to be include" -> "to include" (my bad, also propagated by copypasta in 
both responses). -- Andrei