GC blessed for C++ (again)

[Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Friday, 7 October 2016 at 21:21:43 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
> On Friday, 30 September 2016 at 14:12:30 UTC, Dejan Lekic wrote:
>> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:50:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli 
>> wrote:
>>> [...]
>>
>> The paragraph I like the most there is: "The other important 
>> difference is that deferred_heap meets C++'s zero-overhead 
>> principle by being opt-in and granular, not default and global"
>>
>> That is what I like the most about Herb's work...
>
> We already have opt-in for the most part and I've been pushing 
> for granular with isolated since at least 2014. So yeah, Herb's 
> proposal is old news, but worse, it is kind of disappointing 
> that it is anything new for the D community. I'm not sure if I 
> or the community failed, but clearly there is a major failure 
> here.

I don't know about failing - the isolated thing immediately 
reminded me of your proposal.

Atila