Battle-plan for CTFE

[Uplink_Coder via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sunday, 16 October 2016 at 10:58:57 UTC, Dmitry Olshansky 
wrote:
>
> That LLVM thing is surely nice to have but I highly doubt it 
> will be allowed as dependency for DMD.
>
> ---
> Dmitry Olshansky

LLVM is purely optional.
A pure D interpreter exists.

LLVM optimises most ctfe btw and returns constants.