Beta D 2.071.2-b3

[Martin Nowak via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Sunday, 4 September 2016 at 08:57:15 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> On Saturday, 3 September 2016 at 18:06:37 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> There are enough ways to leak access to private entity (alias, 
>> template argument, taking address, some compile-time 
>> introspection) to make such optimizations impossible without 
>> extensive program analysis.
>
> OK, anything else that would be impaired by allowing access to 
> private members?
> I think the unsafe requirement Walter asked for would be too 
> much for the point release.
> We could create an intermediate solution that ignores 
> visibility but still keep the access checks around (basically 
> the old behavior) until most of them will get removed in a 
> later release.

I'm on vacation and travelling at the moment, so it might take a 
few days until I find time for the implementation.