From the D Blog -- GSoC Report: Step
Yuxuan Shui via Digitalmars-d-announce
digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Sat Sep 10 23:05:58 PDT 2016
On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 18:46:30 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
> On Friday, 9 September 2016 at 18:22:02 UTC, ciechowoj wrote:
>>
>>> I'm not sure about any special syntax which is expected for
>>> languages which have built-in sets. It would probably be
>>> overkill to add syntax support, but I'm not sure how often
>>> people use set literals or not.
>>
>> E.g. Python has build in literals for sets. C++ has sets in
>> standard library. I see the points against adding something
>> like this to the core of language, but it should be at least
>> in the standard library.
>
> You might find the following SO question informative.
>
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/7162274/why-is-d-missing-container-classes
That was 5 years ago! Why do things move so slowly...
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list