GC blessed for C++ (again)

Atila Neves via Digitalmars-d-announce digitalmars-d-announce at puremagic.com
Tue Apr 11 00:33:12 PDT 2017


On Tuesday, 11 April 2017 at 07:02:19 UTC, Swoorup Joshi wrote:
> On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 04:49:34 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
>> On Monday, 10 April 2017 at 04:17:21 UTC, Swoorup Joshi wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, 28 September 2016 at 20:50:28 UTC, Ali Çehreli 
>>> wrote:
>>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/54xnbg/herb_sutters_experimental_deferred_and_unordered/
>>>>
>>>> Ali
>>>
>>> Is it possible to have something similar as in library rather 
>>> than GC in core language construct?
>>
>> Not without breaking changes.
>
> Breaking, you mean the standard library? or including user 
> codebases?

There's nothing stopping anyone from writing something similar in 
D. It just wouldn't make `new` not allocate on the GC heap.

Atila


More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce mailing list