two points

[Walter Bright via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 2/9/2017 8:48 AM, Joseph Rushton Wakeling wrote:
> Contrast this with the experience I had the one time I submitted a (tiny,
> trivial) patch to rust: immediately after submitting the PR I got a message from
> their 'highfive' robot that included:
>
>   * a friendly thank you for the PR;
>
>   * the GitHub ID of a contact who I could expect to be taking responsibility
>     for the PR, who was also assigned as a reviewer;
>
>   * some helpful notes on how to add changes to the PR if requested;
>
>   * a link to the contributor guidelines.
>
> By contrast with a Phobos PR it's not clear who to contact if review or
> decision-making is not forthcoming.

Good idea! Please investigate how to get github to generate such emails. In the 
meantime, the PR guidelines are here:

   http://wiki.dlang.org/Starting_as_a_Contributor#Create_a_pull_request

The teams can be found here:

   https://github.com/orgs/dlang/teams

Please help improve the guidelines.