Release D 2.073.0

[Dicebot via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 01/27/2017 01:29 PM, Nordlöw wrote:
> On Friday, 27 January 2017 at 11:12:22 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
>> And also stuff like https://github.com/dlang/druntime/pull/1740 - I
>> think the story behind `return scope` is the critical point for me. It
>> is worst technical disaster that has happened to compiler in years,
>> and I am going to blame Walter personally for it.
> 
> So what would the alternative be?

Alternative would be to implement new functionality like a responsible
developer - keep it in sync with specification document, design set of
acceptance tests and do all the development in a separate branch until
is verified to both have desired semantics and don't cause any breakage
in existing projects. And don't rush into forcing usage of half-done
feature inside standard library the very moment it got released.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d-announce/attachments/20170127/572d18e6/attachment.sig>