DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

[Steven Schveighoffer via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On 7/16/17 1:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> On 7/16/17 9:10 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
>> Congratulations to Timon Gehr. Not only was his "Static foreach" DIP 
>> accepted, it picked up a good deal of praise from Walter & Andrei.
> 
> Indeed. Kudos to Timon (and thanks Mike for driving the process). This 
> is a well done DIP that many others could draw inspiration from. -- Andrei

What is the resolution of how break statements affect static 
foreach/foreach?

i.e. this section:

"As some consider this to be potentially confusing, it has been 
suggested that break and continue directly inside static foreach should 
instead be compiler errors and require explicit labels. This DIP leaves 
this decision to the language authors, but recommends the above semantics."

-Steve