DIP 1010--Static foreach--Accepted

[Nicholas Wilson via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Monday, 17 July 2017 at 12:38:27 UTC, Steven Schveighoffer 
wrote:
> On 7/16/17 1:04 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> On 7/16/17 9:10 AM, Mike Parker wrote:
>>> Congratulations to Timon Gehr. Not only was his "Static 
>>> foreach" DIP accepted, it picked up a good deal of praise 
>>> from Walter & Andrei.
>> 
>> Indeed. Kudos to Timon (and thanks Mike for driving the 
>> process). This is a well done DIP that many others could draw 
>> inspiration from. -- Andrei
>
> What is the resolution of how break statements affect static 
> foreach/foreach?
>
> i.e. this section:
>
> "As some consider this to be potentially confusing, it has been 
> suggested that break and continue directly inside static 
> foreach should instead be compiler errors and require explicit 
> labels. This DIP leaves this decision to the language authors, 
> but recommends the above semantics."
>
> -Steve

static break & static continue anyone?