Getters/setters generator

[jmh530 via Digitalmars-d-announce]

On Tuesday, 13 June 2017 at 20:31:25 UTC, Eugene Wissner wrote:
>
> I suppose the errors will be more cryptic, since you don't 
> check if the string referers to an existing member.
>
> You provide only get/set that return by value. So you may need 
> to generate getters/setters for const values, for ref values, 
> for const ref values... And it would result in much more code 
> for every object.

Fair point. I just was playing around with it today and was like, 
oh that's pretty easy. It was only when I was trying to see if 
anyone else had done anything like this that I came across your 
project.