New release v0.5 of the D bindings for SAP NetWeaver RFC SDK

[Kai Nacke]

Hi Martin!

On Tuesday, 10 October 2017 at 13:25:43 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
> Thanks, examples are nice for packages.

Examples are a good way to check that the definitions are really 
working. My first version was really buggy.

> Wondering a little about the std. usage, as it seems very 
> unlikely to
> ever become standardized.
> Why not just use sap. or netweaver. as top level package?

It was just of a lack of a better name. Thinking about it I like 
the "netweaver." package name.

> Also I can recommend at least some basic ddoc comments, it's 
> really trivial to use ddox to get some nice documentation, e.g. 
> see https://github.com/MartinNowak/bloom.
>
> If you use x:ddoxFilterArgs without "--only-documented", it 
> should even work for undocumented functions.

Yeah, documentation is a bit weak. Currently, there is not much 
more than the official C API (for which you can download the 
documentation) with some D tuning. But I now start adding more 
functions and I will consider your hint.

Thanks for your feedback!

Regards,
Kai