ldexp and frexp benchmark between Mir, C and Phobos

[9il]

On Saturday, 29 December 2018 at 12:35:03 UTC, kinke wrote:
> On Friday, 28 December 2018 at 19:48:28 UTC, 9il wrote:
> Any chance the multi-precision ldexp can be upstreamed to 
> Phobos (which currently uses real precision for the 
> float/double overloads, which explains the suboptimal 
> performance)? It'd make a *lot* more sense there, instead of 
> having it in a separate library. It's well-known that there's a 
> lot of remaining std.math functions which need proper 
> single/double precision implementations, and ldexp is one of 
> them.

Yes, Mir is Boost licensed, but I don't work on Phobos anymore. 
Mir libraries are going to be independent of Phobos.