dxml 0.2.0 released
bachmeier
no at spam.net
Mon Feb 12 15:45:50 UTC 2018
On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 15:43:59 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 14:04:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis
> wrote:
>
>> However, if folks as a whole think that Phobos' xml parser
>> needs to support the DTD section to be acceptable, then dxml
>> won't replace std.xml, because dxml is not going to implement
>> DTD support. DTD support fundamentally does not fit in with
>> dxml's design.
>
> Can't you simply give it a name other than std.xml that
> indicates it doesn't do everything related to xml? It doesn't
> make sense to not put it into Phobos because of the name, and
> that should be an easy problem to solve.
Hit send too fast. std.xml.base would be reasonable.
More information about the Digitalmars-d-announce
mailing list