dxml 0.2.0 released

[bachmeier]

On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 15:43:59 UTC, bachmeier wrote:
> On Monday, 12 February 2018 at 14:04:38 UTC, Jonathan M Davis 
> wrote:
>
>> However, if folks as a whole think that Phobos' xml parser 
>> needs to support the DTD section to be acceptable, then dxml 
>> won't replace std.xml, because dxml is not going to implement 
>> DTD support. DTD support fundamentally does not fit in with 
>> dxml's design.
>
> Can't you simply give it a name other than std.xml that 
> indicates it doesn't do everything related to xml? It doesn't 
> make sense to not put it into Phobos because of the name, and 
> that should be an easy problem to solve.

Hit send too fast. std.xml.base would be reasonable.