dxml 0.2.0 released

[rikki cattermole]

On 12/02/2018 3:59 PM, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> If std.xml currently does not support DTDs, then I say dxml is
> definitely a Phobos candidate.  At the very least, it does not make the
> current situation worse.  Rejecting dxml because it doesn't support DTDs
> is basically letting the perfect be the enemy of the good, which is
> something this community has been plagued with for far too long.  What's
> worse: a std.dxml that doesn't support DTDs, or a std.xml with
> fundamental problems that continue to plague us for the next decade
> while nobody else steps up to implement a suitable replacement?

dxml 7.5k LOC
std.xml 3k LOC

dxml would make the situation a lot worse.